Injuries is usually a problem for athletes in sport and every athlete and team are invariably examining techniques to prevent injuries. There are generally two types of injury which may occur in sport. One is the trauma which is more difficult to protect against and depends on tactics like rule changes to guard players and the use of protective gear. One other form of injury is the one in connection with the training workloads and it is frequently an overuse kind of injury. To avoid most of these injuries, then there really needs to be a watchful management of the amount of work or training which the athlete performs. It is essential that training loads are increased slowly but surely so the athlete's body has time to adapt to the stresses which are. If you have too much load, after that an overuse injury is a lot more likely to occur.
There have been designed a variety of keeping track of tools in which are widely-used to maintain a check on the athlete’s training to ensure they have enough rests as well as breaks to make sure that the tissues will adapt to those loads. A particular issue is when the athlete has a spike or sudden increase in the exercise load when compared to the background exercise load. A formula, generally known as the acute:chronic workload ratio was created with the acute workload being exactly what the athlete has done in the last 7-day period and the chronic workload being what they've trained in the previous 30 days. If there's an increase in this proportion, then they are thought to be at risk for injury. Even though this does seem fairly straightforward, there is actually large controversy around the science that back up this ratio. The latest edition of PodChatLive talked about the troubles with Franco Impellizzeri on these trouble using the model and exactly how it may be used forward into the longer term.